An Islamic Review of the Ineffectiveness of Western Politics in Supporting the Social Order of Society
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/iceat.v3i1.241Keywords:
Islamic Law, Political Ethics, Societal Stability, Social Justice, Western PoliticsAbstract
Western political concepts rooted in secularism, liberalism and rationalism have become the dominant currents in organizing the lives of modern societies. However, in practice, this model often fails to ensure social justice, societal stability, and the integration of moral values in the power structure. This article aims to analyze the fundamental weaknesses in the Western political system, especially in terms of ensuring a harmonious and just social order. Through a normative and descriptive approach, this study uses the perspective of Islamic law as a tool of criticism, which emphasizes the importance of the values of tawhid, justice (al-ilah), benefit (maṣlaḥah), and the responsibility of power (al-mas'ūliyyah). The anal-ysis shows that Islamic politics offers a more complete ethical and transcendental framework in sus-taining social life, compared to Western politics that tends to be technocratic and pragmatic. Thus, it is necessary to reorient global political thought so that it does not only focus on legal-formal aspects, but also on the spiritual and moral dimensions that are at the core of Islamic law.
Downloads
References
Al-Faruqi, I. R. (1992). Al-Tawhid: Its implications for thought and life. International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Al-Ghazali, A. H. M. (1992). At-Tibr al-Masbūk fī naṣīḥah al-mulūk. Dar al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyyah.
Al-Ghazali, A. H. M. (2005). Iḥyā' 'ulūm al-dīn [Revival of the religious sciences] (Vol. 3). Dar al-Fikr.
Al-Mawardi, A. H. (1996). Al-Aḥkām al-Sulṭāniyyah (Trans.). Dar al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyyah.
Al-Māwardī, A. H. (1996). Al-Aḥkām al-Sulṭāniyyah. Dar al-Fikr.
Bauman, Z. (2007). Liquid times: Living in an age of uncertainty. Polity Press.
Berger, P. L. (1990). The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. Anchor Books.
Descartes, R. (1998). Discourse on method and meditations on first philosophy (D. A. Cress, Trans.). Hackett Publishing.
Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. Free Press.
Fukuyama, F. (2006). The end of history and the last man. Free Press.
Higley, J., & Burton, M. G. (2006). Elite foundations of liberal democracy. Rowman & Littlefield.
Mutiullah, M. Y. N. (2023). Al-Ghazali in the political ethics and governance: An analytical studies on Al-Tibr al-Masbūk fī naṣīḥah al-mulk. Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.21111/tasfiyah.v7i2.9761
Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Rev. ed.). Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042582
Roskin, M. G., Cord, R. L., Medeiros, J. A., & Jones, W. S. (2012). Political science: An introduction (13th ed.). Pearson.
Sachedina, A. (2001). The Islamic roots of democratic pluralism. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195139914.001.0001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Proceeding of the International Conference on Economics, Accounting, and Taxation

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





