The Meaning of Sustainability in Business Strategy: An Interpretive Approach to the Integration of Social and Profit Values in Modern Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/iceat.v2i2.183Keywords:
Corporate Responsibility, Ethical Leadership, Interpretive Accounting, Social Construction, SustainabilityAbstract
This study explores how Generation Z constructs work values and meaning in modern organizations shaped by digitalization and social transformation. Using a qualitative phenomenological approach under a social constructivist paradigm, the research investigates the lived experiences of young professionals in the digital, creative, and startup sectors. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and non-participant observation and analyzed using thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006; Moustakas, 1994). Findings show that Generation Z defines work through three interrelated dimensions: (1) intrinsic motivation grounded in personal purpose and self-expression, (2) redefined productivity emphasizing creativity and emotional balance rather than quantitative output, and (3) job satisfaction derived from inclusive culture and adaptive leadership. These results support Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan, 2000) and Social Constructionism (Berger & Luckmann, 1966), showing that work meaning is socially constructed rather than objectively given. Overall, the study concludes that for Generation Z, work represents not merely economic activity but a medium for identity, contribution, and personal growth, urging organizations to embrace meaning-centered and value-driven leadership to enhance engagement and fulfillment.
Downloads
References
Adams, C. A. (2002). Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: Beyond current theorising. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(2), 223–250. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210418905
Adams, C. A. (2020). Sustainability reporting and value creation. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(5), 889–907. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2020-0329
Bebbington, J., Unerman, J., & O’Dwyer, B. (2014). Sustainability accounting and accountability. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315848419
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Burr, V. (2015). Social constructionism (3rd ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315715421
Cho, C. H., Laine, M., Roberts, R. W., & Rodrigue, M. (2015). Organized hypocrisy, organizational façades, and sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 40(1), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.12.003
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Deegan, C. (2017). Twenty five years of social and environmental accounting research within Critical Perspectives on Accounting: Hits, misses and ways forward. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 43, 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2016.06.005
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing.
Fitri, W., Rahmawati, R., & Suryadi, A. (2024). Corporate sustainability and stakeholder engagement in Indonesian listed companies: From formal compliance to ethical transformation. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 21(2), 135–152.
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability…and how would we know? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.006
Gray, R., & Milne, M. J. (2015). It’s not what you do, it’s the way that you do it? Of method and madness. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 32, 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2015.04.005
Hopwood, A. G. (1992). Accounting calculation and the shifting sphere of the economic. European Accounting Review, 1(1), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638189200000011
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
O’Dwyer, B. (2003). Conceptions of corporate social responsibility: The nature of managerial capture. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 16(4), 523–557. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570310492290
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism—and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, 89(1–2), 62–77.
Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2017). Managing sustainability performance measurement and reporting in an integrated manner: Sustainability accounting as the link between sustainability management and reporting. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 13(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAAPE.2017.083689
Schwandt, T. A. (2014). The Sage dictionary of qualitative inquiry (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Siahay, A. Z. D. (2023). Building public trust through transparency and accountability: A systematic review of the role of public-sector accounting. Journal of Economic Research, 15(3), 210–225.
Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. New York: Guilford Press.
Tilt, C. A. (2018). Making social and environmental accounting research relevant in developing countries: A matter of context? Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 38(2), 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2018.1489296
Unerman, J., Bebbington, J., & O’Dwyer, B. (2018). Corporate reporting and accounting for sustainable development.New York: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Proceeding of the International Conference on Economics, Accounting, and Taxation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
