Accounting as a Social Construction: Interpreting the Meaning of Transparency and Responsibility in the Modern Business World
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/iceat.v2i2.182Keywords:
Social Construction, TransparencyAbstract
This study aims to understand how accounting functions as a social construction in shaping the meaning of transparency and responsibility in the modern business world. Accounting has long been viewed as a technical, neutral, and objective system; however, both financial and non-financial reporting practices also reflect the values, ideologies, and moral consciousness embedded within organizations. Using a qualitative interpretive approach within the framework of social constructivism (Berger & Luckmann, 1966), this study explores the meanings constructed by accounting practitioners through social interactions, organizational culture, and reporting policies. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participatory observations, and document analysis of corporate reports, and were analyzed using interpretative thematic analysis. The results reveal that transparency and responsibility are not merely formal obligations but the outcomes of social processes involving the externalization of values by leaders, the objectivation of those values through reporting systems, and their internalization within individual moral awareness. In this context, accounting functions as a social language that reflects organizational morality, legitimacy, and identity. Organizations with participatory and reflective cultures are found to develop more authentic transparency, while bureaucratic structures tend to produce symbolic transparency. Theoretically, this study contributes to the discourse of critical accounting by asserting that accounting numbers and reports are socially constructed artifacts imbued with values. Practically, the findings highlight the importance of ethical leadership, reflective culture, and social dialogue as foundational elements for implementing authentic transparency and sustainable corporate responsibility.
Downloads
References
Adams, C. A. (2002). Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: Beyond current theorising. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(2), 223–250. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210418905
Adams, C. A. (2002). Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: Beyond current theorising. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(2), 223–250. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210418905
Bebbington, J., & Gray, R. (2001). An account of sustainability: Failure, success and a reconceptualization. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12(5), 557–587. https://doi.org/10.1006/cpac.2000.0450
Bebbington, J., & Gray, R. (2001). An account of sustainability: Failure, success and a reconceptualization. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12(5), 557–587. https://doi.org/10.1006/cpac.2000.0450
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Burritt, R. L., & Schaltegger, S. (2010). Sustainability accounting and reporting: Fad or trend? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(7), 829–846. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571011080144
Burritt, R. L., & Schaltegger, S. (2010). Sustainability accounting and reporting: Fad or trend? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(7), 829–846. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571011080144
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Deegan, C. (2017). Twenty five years of social and environmental accounting research within Critical Perspectives on Accounting: Hits, misses and ways forward. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 43, 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2016.06.005
Deegan, C. (2017). Twenty five years of social and environmental accounting research within Critical Perspectives on Accounting: Hits, misses and ways forward. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 43, 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2016.06.005
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Doddaullarthi, B. (2024). What drives social accounting research? Insights from a literature-review perspective. Environmental Quality Management, 33(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.22317
Doddaullarthi, B. (2024). What drives social accounting research? Insights from a literature-review perspective. Environmental Quality Management, 33(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.22317
Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing.
Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing.
Fitri, W., Rahmawati, R., & Suryadi, A. (2024). Corporate accountability and the culture of transparency in Indonesian business: A qualitative review. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 72(1), 33–52.
Fitri, W., Rahmawati, R., & Suryadi, A. (2024). Corporate accountability and the culture of transparency in Indonesian business: A qualitative review. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 72(1), 33–52.
Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability…and how would we know? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.006
Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability…and how would we know? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.006
Gray, R., & Milne, M. J. (2015). It’s not what you do, it’s the way that you do it? Of method and madness. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 32, 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2015.04.005
Gray, R., & Milne, M. J. (2015). It’s not what you do, it’s the way that you do it? Of method and madness. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 32, 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2015.04.005
Herzig, C., & Schaltegger, S. (2011). Corporate sustainability reporting: An overview. In S. Schaltegger, M. Bennett, & R. Burritt (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and reporting (pp. 301–324). Dordrecht: Springer.
Herzig, C., & Schaltegger, S. (2011). Corporate sustainability reporting: An overview. In S. Schaltegger, M. Bennett, & R. Burritt (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and reporting (pp. 301–324). Dordrecht: Springer.
Hopwood, A. G. (1992). Accounting calculation and the shifting sphere of the economic. European Accounting Review, 1(1), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638189200000011
Hopwood, A. G. (1992). Accounting calculation and the shifting sphere of the economic. European Accounting Review, 1(1), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638189200000011
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
O’Dwyer, B. (2003). Conceptions of corporate social responsibility: The nature of managerial capture. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 16(4), 523–557. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570310492290
O’Dwyer, B. (2003). Conceptions of corporate social responsibility: The nature of managerial capture. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 16(4), 523–557. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570310492290
O’Dwyer, B. (2005). The construction of a social account: A case study in social accounting processes and transparency. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(3), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2004.05.005
O’Dwyer, B. (2005). The construction of a social account: A case study in social accounting processes and transparency. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(3), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2004.05.005
Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2017). Managing sustainability performance measurement and reporting in an integrated manner: Sustainability accounting as the link between sustainability management and reporting. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 13(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAAPE.2017.083689
Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2017). Managing sustainability performance measurement and reporting in an integrated manner: Sustainability accounting as the link between sustainability management and reporting. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 13(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAAPE.2017.083689
Siahay, A. Z. D. (2023). Building public trust through transparency and accountability: A systematic review of the role of public-sector accounting. Journal of Economic Research, 15(3), 210–225.
Siahay, A. Z. D. (2023). Building public trust through transparency and accountability: A systematic review of the role of public-sector accounting. Journal of Economic Research, 15(3), 210–225.
Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. New York: Guilford Press.
Stake, R. E. (2010). Qualitative research: Studying how things work. New York: Guilford Press.
Tilt, C. A. (2018). Making social and environmental accounting research relevant in developing countries: A matter of context? Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 38(2), 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2018.1489296
Tilt, C. A. (2018). Making social and environmental accounting research relevant in developing countries: A matter of context? Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 38(2), 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2018.1489296
Unerman, J., Bebbington, J., & O'Dwyer, B. (2018). Corporate reporting and accounting for sustainable development.New York: Routledge.
Unerman, J., Bebbington, J., & O'Dwyer, B. (2018). Corporate reporting and accounting for sustainable development.New York: Routledge.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Proceeding of the International Conference on Economics, Accounting, and Taxation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
