The Impact of Ownership Structure and Corporate Social Responsibility on Profitability and Firm Value of Companies Listed on The Indonesia Stock Exchange: An Analysis of Recent Data

Authors

  • Rusdiah Hasanuddin Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Yayasan Pendidikan Ujung Pandang

Keywords:

Ownership Structure, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Profitability, Firm Value Indonesia Stock Exchange

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the impact of ownership structure and corporate social responsibility (CSR) on the profitability and firm value of companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Utilizing the latest data from annual reports published between 2021 and 2023, this research employs multiple regression analysis to test the proposed hypotheses. The findings reveal that (1) ownership structure has a positive and significant effect on the firm's profitability, indicating that diversified ownership can enhance financial performance; (2) corporate social responsibility positively and significantly influences profitability, suggesting that companies engaged in CSR initiatives tend to be more profitable; (3) ownership structure does not have a significant impact on firm value, indicating that other factors may be more dominant in market valuation; (4) corporate social responsibility positively and significantly affects firm value, implying that investment in CSR can enhance positive investor perceptions; and (5) specifically, corporate social responsibility has a positive and significant impact on the firm value in the manufacturing sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. These findings emphasize the importance of sound ownership strategies and a commitment to social responsibility as key factors in enhancing both profitability and firm value.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2010). Individual and Corporate Social Responsibility. Economica, 77(305), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2009.00887.x

Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Investment Recommendations: An International Study. Financial Analysts Journal, 70(1), 30-54. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v70.n1.1

Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. P. (2000). The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1-2), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00067-2

Dimson, E., Karakas, O., & Li, X. (2015). Active Ownership. Review of Financial Studies, 28(12), 3225-3268. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhv118

Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984

Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325. https://doi.org/10.1086/467037

Gunawan, J., & Sari, A. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Business Research, 112, 199-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.023

He, J., & Li, J. (2019). Ownership Structure, Corporate Governance, and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(1), 81-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3488-2

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate Ownership Around the World. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471-517. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00115

Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery Loves Companies: Whither Social Initiatives by Business? Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268-305. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556659

Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603243002

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.908724

Rachmawati, R., & Kurniawati, D. (2018). The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance in Indonesia. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 8(4), 90-97. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijefi.6964

Reddy, K. S., & Ghosh, S. (2019). Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: An Empirical Evidence from India. Journal of Corporate Finance, 58, 272-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.05.004

Revelli, C., & Viviani, J.-L. (2015). Financial Performance of Socially Responsible Investments: A Meta-Analysis. Business Ethics: A European Review, 24(2), 158-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12077

Tirole, J. (2006). The Theory of Corporate Finance. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400835787

Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance-Financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ874>3.0.CO;2-G

Wang, H., & Choi, J. (2013). The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance: The Role of Stakeholder Relations. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(3), 365-378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1260-3

Zeng, S., & Zhao, J. (2019). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Value: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 11(4), 1095. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041095

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Rusdiah Hasanuddin. (2024). The Impact of Ownership Structure and Corporate Social Responsibility on Profitability and Firm Value of Companies Listed on The Indonesia Stock Exchange: An Analysis of Recent Data. Proceeding of the International Conference on Economics, Accounting, and Taxation, 1(2), 403–416. Retrieved from https://prosiding.areai.or.id/index.php/ICEAT/article/view/105